Comparative Analysis of Jung’s Anima–Animus and the Estrophrodite–Androphrodite Archetypes (with FIRO-B Example)

Abstract

This paper introduces the Estrophrodite–Androphrodite archetypal model as an expansion of Jung’s anima– animus theory. Unlike Jung’s gender-specific constructs, these archetypes represent universal feminine (Estrophrodite) and masculine (Androphrodite) principles present in all individuals. Drawing from cross-cultural mythology, psychology, and ethics, the model situates these polarities historically and conceptually, and illustrates patterns of integration and imbalance using FIRO-B assessments of 58 participants. This framework extends Jungian theory by operationalizing archetypal energies in observable behaviors, offering a culturally inclusive and psychologically flexible approach for contemporary practice. The study articulates the Estrophrodite–Androphrodite model, compares it with classical theories, and demonstrates its applied relevance through FIRO-B behavioral patterns.