Level of Knowledge among Sangguniang Kabataan Officials Regarding Parliamentary Procedures and Resolution-Making

Abstract

Youth participation in governance is essential to democratic development, yet many Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) officials lack the procedural knowledge needed for effective leadership—particularly in parliamentary procedures and resolution-making. This study surveyed 94 SK officials in Dapa, Surigao del Norte using a quantitative-descriptive approach to assess their core, technical, and applied knowledge. Guided by Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, the research examined how demographic factors, training exposure, and environmental support influence procedural competence. Results showed that SK officials had an overall mean score of 3.21, interpreted as “Agree” and qualitatively described as “Moderately Knowledgeable.” The highest-rated item was understanding quorum requirements (M = 3.81), while the lowest was procedural motions (M = 2.78). Technical knowledge scored a mean of 3.09, and applied procedural knowledge averaged 2.94, indicating gaps in practical application. Common challenges included lack of formal training (M = 3.67), time constraints (M = 3.42), and limited mentorship (M = 3.38). Statistical analysis confirmed a significant relationship (p < 0.05) between parliamentary knowledge and resolution quality. The study recommends targeted capacity-building programs, mentorship initiatives, and institutional support to enhance procedural fluency and governance effectiveness among SK officials